Back to Marcellus Fragments Home

Fragment number Vinzent 2
Klostermann 34
Rettb. 29
Ancient source used Eusebius, Against Marcellus 1.4
Modern edition M. Vinzent, Markell von Ankyra: Die Fragmente (Leiden, 1997).
Translator’s Note In this fragment, Marcellus, with the intent of refuting, quotes the writings of Asterius about the manner in which the Father brought forth the Son. According to Asterius, those who are fleshly and sensual claim that he fathered the Son in the normal, human way. Such views, the product of fleshly thinking, are claimed as fact. Since the fragment does not contain Marcellus comments concerning this quote, we are uncertain of what exactly he finds wrong with Asterius teaching on this point.

Let me remind you of the things Asterius has written commending what Eusebius has incorrectly written, so that you may know that he clearly shrinks from the earlier promise. For he has written in his very own words, The main point of the letter is to show that it was the plan of the Father to bring about the birth of the Son, and that the offspring of God was not produced by fleshly passion, which the wisest of the fathers showed in their personal writings, guarding themselves against the wickedness of heretics. Yet, certain fleshly and sensual people speak falsely about God as bearing a child, making their proposals into fact.

Translated by Daniel Noonan under the supervision of Prof. Glen L. Thompson

Last updated: 12-6-2010

No Responses yet