Marcellus Fragment 10
Back to Marcellus Fragments Home
| Fragment number | Vinzent 10 Klostermann 3 Rettb. 3 |
| Ancient source used | Eusebius, Against Marcellus 1.4 |
| Modern edition | M. Vinzent, Markell von Ankyra: Die Fragmente (Leiden, 1997). |
Now let us examine a specific statement from Asterius’ writings: “The Father, who produced from himself the only-begotten Logos, the firstborn of all creation, is different from the Logos.” He wrote, “only-begotten and firstborn,” joining these names together, although they very much contradict each other, as even those who have difficulty learning can understand. It is clear that the only-begotten Son, if he really is the only-begotten, can no longer be the firstborn, and the firstborn, as a firstborn, cannot be only-begotten.
Translated by Daniel Noonan under the supervision of Prof. Glen L. Thompson
Last updated: 12-6-2010
No Responses yet
