|Fragment number||Vinzent 10
|Ancient source used||Eusebius, Against Marcellus 1.4|
|Modern edition||M. Vinzent, Markell von Ankyra: Die Fragmente (Leiden, 1997).|
Now let us examine one specific statement from Asterius’ writings. He said, “For one is the Father, who begot from himself the only-begotten Word, the firstborn of all creation.” He has written, “only-begotten” and “firstborn,” joining both together even though there is a great contradiction between the names, as even those who have great difficulty learning can easily understand. For it is clear that the only-begotten, if he really is only-begotten, can no longer be a firstborn, and the firstborn as such cannot be only-begotten.
Translated by Daniel Noonan under the supervision of Prof. Glen L. Thompson, revised AMJ
Last updated: 8-29-2012
No Responses yet